Speech May Be Ten Times Older Than Previously Thought

New research suggests that speech may not be dependent on the “descended larynx” which could mean that our ancestors were talking 20 million years ago
Baboons raised in semi-liberty produce about ten vocalizations, associated with different ethological situations, that may be considered as proto-vowels, at the dawn of the emergence of speech. © Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive (CNRS/Aix-Marseille Université)
For 50 years, the theory of the “descended larynx” has stated that before speech can emerge, the larynx must be in a low position to produce differentiated vowels. Monkeys, which have a vocal tract anatomy that resembles that of humans in the essential articulators (tongue, jaw, lips) but with a higher larynx, could not produce differentiated vocalizations. Researchers at the CNRS and the Université Grenoble Alpes, in collaboration with French, Canadian, and U.S. teams, argue in a new article published in Science Advances that monkeys produce well differentiated proto-vowels. The production of differentiated vocalizations is not therefore a question of anatomical variants but of control of articulators. This work leads us to think that speech could have emerged before the 200,000 years ago that linguists currently assert.
Comparison of the anatomy of the vocal tract of baboons (on the left) and modern humans (on the right). The same articulators, with their muscles, bone and cartilages, but in humans the larynx is lower, increasing the relative size of the pharynx relative to the mouth. The acoustic analysis of monkey vocalizations shows that, despite this anatomical difference, they can produce differentiated “proto-vowels” that we can compare with vowels of world languages. © Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive (CNRS/Aix-Marseille Université) et GIPSA-lab (CNRS/Université Grenoble Alpes)
Since speech can be considered as being the cornerstone of the
human species, it is not surprising that two pairs of researchers (in the
1930s-1950s) tested the possibility of teaching a home-raised chimpanzee to
speak, at the same time and under the same conditions as their baby. Their
experiments ended in failure. To explain this result, U.S. researcher, Philip
Lieberman, proposed the theory of the descended larynx (TDL) in 1969. By
comparing the human vocal tract to monkeys, Lieberman argued that chimpanzees
have a small pharynx, related to the high position of their larynx, whereas in
humans, the larynx is lower. This anatomic difference was claimed to prevent
differentiated vowel production, which is present in all the world’s languages
and necessary for spoken language. Despite some criticisms and many acoustic
observations that contradict the TDL, it would come to be accepted by most
More recently, articles on monkeys’ articulatory capacities have
shown that they may have used a system of proto-vowels1. Considering the acoustic cavities formed
by the tongue, jaw, and lips (identical in primates and humans), they showed
that production of differentiated vocalizations is not a question of anatomy
but relates to control of articulators. The data used to establish the TDL came
in fact from cadavers, so they could not reveal control of this nature.
This analysis, conducted by pluridisciplinary specialists in the GIPSA-Lab (CNRS/Université Grenoble Alpes/Grenoble INP), in collaboration with the Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive (CNRS/Aix-Marseille Université), the University of Alabama (USA), the Laboratoire d’Anatomie de l’Université de Montpellier, the Laboratoire de Phonétique de l’Université du Québec (Canada), CRBLM in Montréal (Canada) and the Laboratoire Histoire Naturelle de l’Homme Préhistorique (CNRS/Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle /UPVD), opens new perspectives: if the emergence of articulated speech is no longer dependent on the descent of the larynx, which took place about 200,000 years ago, scientists can now envisage much earlier speech emergence, as far back as at least 20 million years, a time when our common ancestor with monkeys lived, who already presumably had the capacity to produce contrasted vocalizations.
Click here for videos of baboons producing vocalizations similar to vowels.
Reference: Which way to the dawn of speech: Reanalyzing half a century of debates and data in light of speech science. Louis-Jean Boë, Thomas R. Sawallis, Joël Fagot, Pierre Badin, Guillaume Barbier, Guillaume Captier, Lucie Ménard, Jean-Louis Heim, Jean-Luc Schwartz. Science Advances, le 11 décembre 2019. DOI : sciadv.aaw3916


'Speech May Be Ten Times Older Than Previously Thought' has no comments

Be the first to comment this post!

Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.